home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1991 / 91_2012 / 2012r046.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  72KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | bulletin board | reckoner | sky | windowpane
OCR: 36 County Such a result PinoM be totally inappropriate and cannot be sguared with Gingles the Voting Rights Act Geographic Compactness and the Commis- sioner Form of Government The compactness requirement OE Gingles is applicable to challenge to sole commissioner size government, pue the court appeals did not the county claims, disregard Plaintiffs were required show not that they pinod be majority countywide, but that they could be majority "within restructured form of the chal- lenged system when the existing structure is being chal lenged dilutive. {emphasis T orig inal) Accord Carroltton Branch Of NAACI Stallings, supra 829 F.2d 1563 (Gingles requires plaintiffs to show that they are sufficiently numerous ard compact constitute majority ir single member district, single member district ...